Too true to be funny...

The next time you hear a politician use the word 'billion' in a casual manner, think about whether you want the 'politicians' spending YOUR tax money.

A billion is a difficult number to comprehend but one advertising agency did a good job of putting that figure into some perspective in one of it's recent releases.

A. A billion seconds ago it was 1959.

B. A billion minutes ago Jesus was alive.

C. A billion hours ago our ancestors were Living in the Stone Age.

D. A billion days ago no-one walked on the earth on two feet.

E. A billion Pounds ago was only 13 hours and 12 minutes, At the rate Our (sic) government is spending it.

Building Permit Tax * Cigarette Tax * Alchohol and Spirits Tax * Corporate Income Tax * Income Tax * Vat on fucking everything Tax * Unemployment Tax * Fishing License Tax * Food License Tax * Fuel Permit Tax * Petrol/Diesel Tax * Hunting License Tax * Inheritance Tax * Inventory Tax (tax on top of tax) * Luxury goods Tax * Marriage License Tax * Property Tax * Service charge Taxes * Social Security Tax * Road Tax * Council Tax * Vehicle License Registration Tax * Vehicle Sales Tax * Workers Compensation Tax * TV License Tax *

To name but a few...

STILL THINK THIS IS FUNNY? Not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago...

Don't fall for their Tricks!

I can't bring myself to think that Yesterday's banning of Islam4UK by Nu Labour was in any way a good thing. In fact I feel anyone with half a brain who applauds this, is not seeing the bigger picture.

I'm no fan of militant Islam, or any religion for that matter, but I am a huge fan of freedom. Islam4UK or whatever guise they go under, have, in my eyes, an inalienable right to protest and make their views known. If you put restraints on Freedom - You don't have Freedom, period. Just because we disagree with someone doesn't mean we should seek the State to decide who can and can't be allowed to speak or protest. When we allow the State to impose on us who we can, and cannot allow to be heard, then we have lost any semblance of freedom we thought we had.
Remember the old Chinese proverb...'Chains are Chains, no matter their length'.

I'm old enough to remember the Thatcher Government banning the National Front from marching in the early 80s. The old bag also brought in legislation to curb marches and demonstrations, citing the NF as an excuse to so. The Liberal/Left stayed quiet as this draconian legislation was introduced, because it suited their short-term purpose to see the NF stopped. But who was this legislation first used against? It was the Miners and Steel Workers and Print workers, whose industries the Old Lizard wrecked and then threw those same workers on the scrapheap. It was too late to complain then. The law was already in place and the ability to vigorously oppose Thatcher, and her destruction of British Industry and Communities, was severely curtailed.

That's why this shower of Illuminati New Labour yes-men are so eager to Ban Islam4UK. They know when they have precedents like this they will be able to ban any similar groups, foreign or home grown, who may challenge the New World Order and its deeds. But it'll be too late to start complaining then, when we said nothing about their previous proscriptions...because we didn't like what they had to say.

Billy Connolly puts Gordon in his Place

Golden Gordon

How they Work

As I mentioned in an earlier post, The Illuminati will use any tactic at their disposal to divide and conquer the people. Mass Immigration is a tool they use to do just that - having the indigenous people at logger heads with the new arrivals while they carry on behind the scenes, pulling the strings. Political Correctness won't disguise this unpalatable truth...


The huge increases in immigration over the past decade were in part a politically-motivated attempt by ministers to socially engineer a more multicultural Britain, a former government adviser said yesterday.



Andrew Neather, a speechwriter who worked in Downing Street for Tony Blair and in the Home Office for Jack Straw and David Blunkett, said Labour’s relaxation of controls was a deliberate plan to “open up the UK to mass migration”.


As well as bringing in hundreds of thousands more migrants to plug labour market gaps, there was also a “driving political purpose” behind immigration policy, he revealed. Ministers hoped to radically change the country and by doing so “rub the Right’s nose in diversity”.


But Mr Neather said senior Labour figures were reluctant to discuss the policy, fearing it would alienate its “core working-class vote”.


Critics said the revelations showed a “conspiracy” within government to impose mass immigration for “cynical” political reasons.


On Question Time on Thursday night, Mr Straw was repeatedly quizzed about whether Labour’s immigration policies had left the door open for the BNP.


Writing in a London newspaper, Mr Neather revealed the “major shift” in immigration policy came after the publication of a policy paper from the Performance and Innovation Unit, a Downing Street think tank based in the Cabinet Office. The published version promoted the labour market case for immigration but Mr Neather said unpublished versions contained additional reasons. He wrote: “Earlier drafts I saw also included a driving political purpose: that mass immigration was the way that the government was going to make the UK truly multicultural.



“I remember coming away from some discussions with the clear sense that the policy was intended — even if this wasn’t its main purpose — to rub the Right’s nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date.”



The “deliberate policy”, from late 2000 until “at least February last year”, when the new points based system was introduced, was to open up the UK to mass migration, he said.
Mr Neather defended the policy, saying mass immigration has “enriched” Britain, and made London a more attractive and cosmopolitan place. But he acknowledged that “nervous” ministers made no mention of the policy for fear of alienating Labour voters.